Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Шоу: 20 | 50 | 100
Результаты 1 - 9 de 9
Фильтр
Добавить фильтры

база данных
Годовой диапазон
1.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 4830, 2022 08 22.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2000885

Реферат

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a recently-emerged infectious disease that has caused millions of deaths, where comprehensive understanding of disease mechanisms is still unestablished. In particular, studies of gene expression dynamics and regulation landscape in COVID-19 infected individuals are limited. Here, we report on a thorough analysis of whole blood RNA-seq data from 465 genotyped samples from the Japan COVID-19 Task Force, including 359 severe and 106 non-severe COVID-19 cases. We discover 1169 putative causal expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) including 34 possible colocalizations with biobank fine-mapping results of hematopoietic traits in a Japanese population, 1549 putative causal splice QTLs (sQTLs; e.g. two independent sQTLs at TOR1AIP1), as well as biologically interpretable trans-eQTL examples (e.g., REST and STING1), all fine-mapped at single variant resolution. We perform differential gene expression analysis to elucidate 198 genes with increased expression in severe COVID-19 cases and enriched for innate immune-related functions. Finally, we evaluate the limited but non-zero effect of COVID-19 phenotype on eQTL discovery, and highlight the presence of COVID-19 severity-interaction eQTLs (ieQTLs; e.g., CLEC4C and MYBL2). Our study provides a comprehensive catalog of whole blood regulatory variants in Japanese, as well as a reference for transcriptional landscapes in response to COVID-19 infection.


Тема - темы
COVID-19 , Genome-Wide Association Study , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/genetics , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Lectins, C-Type/genetics , Membrane Glycoproteins/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Quantitative Trait Loci/genetics , Receptors, Immunologic/genetics
2.
Nature ; 609(7928): 754-760, 2022 09.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1984401

Реферат

Identifying the host genetic factors underlying severe COVID-19 is an emerging challenge1-5. Here we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) involving 2,393 cases of COVID-19 in a cohort of Japanese individuals collected during the initial waves of the pandemic, with 3,289 unaffected controls. We identified a variant on chromosome 5 at 5q35 (rs60200309-A), close to the dedicator of cytokinesis 2 gene (DOCK2), which was associated with severe COVID-19 in patients less than 65 years of age. This risk allele was prevalent in East Asian individuals but rare in Europeans, highlighting the value of genome-wide association studies in non-European populations. RNA-sequencing analysis of 473 bulk peripheral blood samples identified decreased expression of DOCK2 associated with the risk allele in these younger patients. DOCK2 expression was suppressed in patients with severe cases of COVID-19. Single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis (n = 61 individuals) identified cell-type-specific downregulation of DOCK2 and a COVID-19-specific decreasing effect of the risk allele on DOCK2 expression in non-classical monocytes. Immunohistochemistry of lung specimens from patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia showed suppressed DOCK2 expression. Moreover, inhibition of DOCK2 function with CPYPP increased the severity of pneumonia in a Syrian hamster model of SARS-CoV-2 infection, characterized by weight loss, lung oedema, enhanced viral loads, impaired macrophage recruitment and dysregulated type I interferon responses. We conclude that DOCK2 has an important role in the host immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and the development of severe COVID-19, and could be further explored as a potential biomarker and/or therapeutic target.


Тема - темы
COVID-19 , GTPase-Activating Proteins , Genome-Wide Association Study , Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors , Host Microbial Interactions , SARS-CoV-2 , Alleles , Animals , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/genetics , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/physiopathology , Disease Models, Animal , GTPase-Activating Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , GTPase-Activating Proteins/genetics , GTPase-Activating Proteins/metabolism , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors/antagonists & inhibitors , Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors/genetics , Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors/metabolism , Host Microbial Interactions/genetics , Host Microbial Interactions/immunology , Humans , Interferon Type I/genetics , Interferon Type I/immunology , Japan , Lung/pathology , Macrophages , Mesocricetus , Middle Aged , Pneumonia/complications , Pyrazoles/pharmacology , RNA-Seq , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Viral Load , Weight Loss
3.
Respiration ; 101(4): 422-432, 2022.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1840677

Реферат

BACKGROUND: Surgical lung biopsy (SLB) is performed in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); however, its clinical utility remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: We categorized the pathological diagnoses and investigated the predictive value for short-term mortality. METHOD: Three electronic databases (MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched for the included studies. The QUADAS-2 was used to evaluate the risk of bias and its applicability. The types and populations of pathological diagnoses were investigated. The pooled sensitivity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were estimated at a fixed specificity. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies that enrolled 758 patients were included. The pathological diagnoses were as follows: diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) 29.9%; infection 24.7%; interstitial lung disease 17.2%; malignancy 3.6%; cardiovascular disease 3.6%; drug toxicity 2.3%; connective tissue disease 2.2%; allergic disease 1.1%; and nonspecific diagnosis 15.4%. To predict short-term mortality, 13 studies that enrolled 613 patients used DAD as an index test and recorded a mortality rate of 56.9% (349 of 613 patients). A total of 3 studies that used index tests other than DAD were excluded. The pooled sensitivity, fixed specificity, LR+, LR-, and DOR were 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.56), 0.69, 1.48 (95% CI: 0.92-1.81), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.63-1.03), and 1.90 (95% CI: 0.89-2.86), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SLB is unlikely to provide a specific diagnosis and should not be recommended for confirming DAD or predicting ARDS prognosis.


Тема - темы
Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Biopsy , Humans , Lung/pathology , Prognosis , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/diagnosis , Thorax
4.
Keio J Med ; 71(1): 21-30, 2022 Mar 25.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1760149

Реферат

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 as an outbreak of pneumonia of unknown origin. Previous studies have suggested the utility of chest computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of COVID-19 because of its high sensitivity (93%-97%), relatively simple procedure, and rapid test results. This study, performed in Japan early in the epidemic when COVID-19 prevalence was low, evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of chest CT in a population presenting with lung diseases having CT findings similar to those of COVID-19. We retrospectively included all consecutive patients (≥18 years old) presenting to the outpatient department of Keio University Hospital between March 1 and May 31, 2020, with fever and respiratory symptoms. We evaluated the performance of diagnostic CT for COVID-19 by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results as the reference standard. We determined the numbers of false-positive (FP) results and assessed the clinical utility using decision curve analysis. Of the 175 patients, 22 were PCR-positive. CT had a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 57%. Patients with FP results on CT diagnosis were mainly diagnosed with diseases mimicking COVID-19, e.g., interstitial lung disease. Decision curve analysis indicated that the clinical utility of CT imaging was limited. The diagnostic performance of CT for COVID-19 was inadequate in an area with low COVID-19 prevalence and a high prevalence of other lung diseases with chest CT findings similar to those of COVID-19. Considering this insufficient diagnostic performance, CT findings should be evaluated in the context of additional medical information to diagnose COVID-19.


Тема - темы
COVID-19 , Adolescent , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
5.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 8(1)2021 11.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1537963

Реферат

INTRODUCTION: The rapid spread of COVID-19 posed a global burden. Substantial number of people died of the disease in the acute phase of infection. In addition, a significant proportion of patients have been reported to suffer from post-acute phase symptoms, sequelae of COVID-19, which may negatively influence the quality of daily living and/or socioeconomic circumstances of the patients. However, no previous study has comprehensively and objectively assessed the quality of life of patients by using existing international scales. Further, evidence of socioeconomic consequences among patients with COVID-19 is scarce. To address the multidimensional issues from sequelae of COVID-19, evidence from comprehensive surveys beyond clinical perspectives is critical that investigates health, and social determinants of disease progression as well as socioeconomic consequences at a large scale. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this study, we plan to conduct a nationwide and comprehensive survey for the sequelae of COVID-19 in a total of 1000 patients diagnosed at 27 hospitals throughout Japan. This study will evaluate not only the health-related status of patients from clinical perspectives but also the Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) scores, socioeconomic status and consequences to discuss the sequelae of the disease and the related risk factors. The primary endpoint is the frequency of long-term complications of COVID-19 infection. The secondary endpoints are risk factors for progression to sequelae of COVID-19 infection. The study will provide robust and important evidence as a resource to tackle the issues from the sequelae of COVID-19 from the multi-dimensional perspectives. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial was approved by the Keio University School of Medicine Ethics Committee (20200243, UMIN000042299). The results of this study will be reported at a society meeting or published in a peer-reviewed journal.


Тема - темы
COVID-19 , Cohort Studies , Disease Progression , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Quality of Life , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Respir Investig ; 60(1): 68-81, 2022 Jan.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1382762

Реферат

BACKGROUND: This review aimed to investigate whether bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is safe in patients with severe acute respiratory failure (ARF). METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and other databases up to June 2, 2021 for studies that examined BAL for severe ARF. We included all cohort studies and randomized or non-randomized trials, while we excluded case-control studies, case reports, and case series. We evaluated the quality of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: We included 17 studies (1085 patients) in the meta-analysis. The integrated frequency of death was 0.000% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.000-0.045%, I2 = 0.0%). The pooled risk of severe complications of respiratory system, cardiovascular system, and major bleeding was 1.32% (95% CI: 0.000-4.41%, I2 = 84.8%), 0.040% (95% CI: 0.000-0.71%, I2 = 9.3%), and 0.000% (95% CI: 0.000-0.27%, I2 = 0.0%), respectively. In the subgroup analysis with mechanical ventilation during BAL, there were few severe complications of the respiratory system (3/717 patients in 13 studies) and almost no heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that severe complications of BAL for severe ARF are probably rare, particularly in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. After considering the risks and benefits, it would be worthwhile to consider performing BAL in patients with severe ARF of unknown etiology to pursue its cause. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000040600).


Тема - темы
Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Respiratory Insufficiency , Bronchoalveolar Lavage , Cohort Studies , Humans , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/diagnosis , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy
7.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 10727, 2021 05 21.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1238019

Реферат

Corticosteroids use in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is controversial, especially in mild to severe patients who do not require invasive/noninvasive ventilation. Moreover, many factors remain unclear regarding the appropriate use of corticosteroids for COVID-19. In this context, this multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-matched study was launched to evaluate the efficacy of systemic corticosteroid administration for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 ranging in the degree of severity from mild to critically-ill disease. This multicenter, retrospective study enrolled consecutive hospitalized COVID-19 patients diagnosed January-April 2020 across 30 institutions in Japan. Clinical outcomes were compared for COVID-19 patients who received or did not receive corticosteroids, after adjusting for propensity scores. The primary endpoint was the odds ratio (OR) for improvement on a 7-point ordinal score on Day 15. Of 1092 COVID-19 patients analyzed, 118 patients were assigned to either the corticosteroid and non-corticosteroid group, after propensity score matching. At baseline, most patients did not require invasive/noninvasive ventilation (85.6% corticosteroid group vs. 89.8% non-corticosteroid group). The odds of improvement in a 7-point ordinal score on Day 15 was significantly lower for the corticosteroid versus non-corticosteroid group (OR, 0.611; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.388-0.962; p = 0.034). The time to improvement in radiological findings was significantly shorter in the corticosteroid versus non-corticosteroid group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.758; 95% CI, 1.323-2.337; p < 0.001), regardless of baseline clinical status. The duration of invasive mechanical ventilation was shorter in corticosteroid versus non-corticosteroid group (HR, 1.466; 95% CI, 0.841-2.554; p = 0.177). Of the 106 patients who received methylprednisolone, the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter in the pulse/semi-pulse versus standard dose group (HR, 2.831; 95% CI, 1.347-5.950; p = 0.006). In conclusion, corticosteroids for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 did not improve clinical status on Day 15, but reduced the time to improvement in radiological findings for all patients regardless of disease severity and also reduced the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation in patients who required intubation.Trial registration: This study was registered in the University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry on April 21, 2020 (ID: UMIN000040211).


Тема - темы
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , COVID-19/therapy , Hospitalization , Respiration, Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19/pathology , Critical Illness , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
9.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(35): e21804, 2020 Aug 28.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-740204

Реферат

INTRODUCTION: Pneumonia is one of the most important characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and imaging findings of COVID-19 pneumonia are diverse and change over disease course. However, the detailed clinical course of organizing pneumonia (OP) caused by COVID-19 has not been clarified. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 60-year-old man and a 61-year-old woman diagnosed with mild COVID-19 were admitted to our hospital. Their respiratory symptoms were deteriorating even after initiating treatment with antiviral drugs. DIAGNOSIS: Chest X-rays and computed tomography scan showed a rapid progression of linear consolidation with reversed halo sign, distributed in subpleural and peri-bronchial regions. They also presented with pulmonary fibrosis findings, including traction bronchiectasis and marked lung volume reduction. They were diagnosed with rapidly progressing OP. INTERVENTIONS: They were treated with systemic corticosteroids. OUTCOMES: The patients' imaging findings and respiratory conditions improved rapidly without any adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Physicians should carefully monitor patients with COVID-19, as they can develop rapidly progressive and fibrotic OP, which respond to corticosteroids.


Тема - темы
Coronavirus Infections , Lung , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Prednisolone/administration & dosage , Pulmonary Fibrosis , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Disease Progression , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/etiology , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Pulmonary Fibrosis/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Fibrosis/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Treatment Outcome
Критерии поиска